Thursday, June 30, 2022

A Raisin at Dusk


One recent evening, my wife and I and our dog Argos are hanging out watching the news, playing with our phones, eating some organic trail mix.  I am mostly on my phone, trying to follow some outrage that my brother's twitter page has alerted me to that is competing to monopolize my attention despite the annoying handicap of being a non-user, when through the fog, I hear my wife observing out loud in a very amused tone of voice that Argos seems to love raisins.  Indeed, I look over in time to see him eagerly devouring a big juicy one from my wife's outstretched palm.  That's odd, I think.  Was she not around when my daughter warned me about grapes for dogs that time she saw me innocently feeding one to Argos' predecessor to the throne, Penelope?  The news was both counterintuitive and shocking.  Grapes?  The delicious little things you almost always have around are really bad for dogs? The creatures in your house that keep the floor and your lap clean of food debris? And no one knows about this?  I'd been feeding dogs grapes all my life by that point.  It bore further research but it stuck in my brain.  

I tell my wife that I've heard grapes are bad for dogs.  She shrugs the comment off as the typical kind of malarkey she's used to hearing from me, but something about the dread in my voice makes her instantly seal the trail mix container and set it on her end table like it's a bomb.  Between the two of us, the validity of the statement will not be confirmed because nothing in either of our long histories on earth with grapes and dogs seems to support this insane notion.  If this were a thing, wouldn't grapes come with a warning?  Wouldn't dogs come with a warning?  I take it to google.

"Dogs and grapes" 

The results come back instantly.  Grapes are very bad for dogs.  How bad?  One grape can kill your dog.  What??!  Well, what about raisins?  Raisins are probably worse.   How??!  No one knows for sure, but google seems to be as positive about this as about anything that while some dogs can survive a grape incident with no harm, some unspecified number will develop symptoms of toxicity within 12 to 24 hours-- vomiting,  prolific nasty diarrhea, unusual lethargy.  If this happens, you can kiss Rover good-bye.  The lucky ones will have severe kidney damage that will infirm them for the rest of their miserably short lives.  Most dogs will die within 3 to 4 days.  What??!!  How many dogs does this happen to?  50 to 75% of dogs that die of kidney failure have had a grape.  Okay!! Whatever that means!!  Can anything be done?  Induce vomiting with hydrogen peroxide.  On the other hand, don't induce vomiting.  If you see your dog eating a grape call your vet immediately!  On second thought probably best just to take the dog to the vet for several days' observation.  What do vets say?  What does the AKC say?  These are vets and the AKC!!  One site offers to diagnose your dog over the web for $75.

As I'm scouring page after page in search of some reasonableness, some ounce of pushback, some voice of sanity and calm and coming up empty, I'm sinking deeper and deeper into a rabbit hole of despair.  For my wife, who went across three states to get Argos just before COVID hit and for whom he has become a kind of totem of health and youth and entertainment sustaining her through a dark time, this is all too much.  She begs me to stop reading it.  My heart is breaking for her.  How many raisins did he eat?  A few.  The words almost choke on the way out of her mouth: Maybe ten.

Through all of this Argos is sitting on the couch observing us, looking particularly healthy, innocent,  adorable, puppyish. Probably wondering where the next raisin is.  

Could we be witnessing the end?  In my mind I'm trying out the notion of resisting my reluctance to believe that by allowing raisins into our house we have murdered our dog to get the oomph to rush the dog to the vet for a stomach pumping as google seems to be urging me to.  My wife just wants to go for a walk.  She does not want to yield to the panic that google is trying to enflame in us.  For me it's too late, but a part of me wants to rebel against this unprecedented unanimity in the google results.  We agree that we will not take the dog to the vet. We will not call the vet.  We will not induce vomiting.  We will go for a walk.  If Argos starts vomiting or squirting diarrhea everywhere or becomes catatonic over the next few days we will be chastened and take immediate action.  In the meantime, we will not speak of this again.

In spite of our resolve, a dark cloud hung over proceedings for the next couple of days.  What were those ten raisins doing to our baby in there?  There was no vomiting, no diarrhea, no lethargy.  In fact, there was no poop for 2 days.  A little alarming, but even through the dark lens of doom, Argos persisted in being Argos.  In 2 days, poop came.  It was normal.  

He has survived the 4 day death watch, but will Argos survive this episode indefinitely?  I have no idea.  His forbear, Penelope, lived to a ripe old age following her brush with a grape (and who knows how many other dozens of grapes, raisins and currants were fed to her or scavenged by her without being brought to anyone's attention).  But it has been several days and those ten raisins Argos ate are fading from prominence in our minds.  In the cooler light of day I've gone back to those results in search of some statistic, some fact, something real to hang this panic on, and my conclusion is that the search itself is the only thing real about it.  Apparently for some small percentage of dogs, it was only recently (some say 1989) discovered that grapes could be toxic.  As to why this is so or even if it is real, a case could be made that the scientific results are not yet conclusive.  The google results on the other hand are overwhelming.

From what I can tell, in spite of the unanimity in the google results, there is no way to use them to overcome any skepticism you may feel about the quality of information you can find on the topic on the internet; and to the shame of the veterinary profession, that is with plenty of input from vets.  The volume of sudden panic on this in spite of millennia of dogs and grapes coexisting peacefully is somewhat reminiscent of the emergence of peanut allergies and satanic daycare facilities as cause for national alarm within the same time frame.  For all of the internet's abundant power to answer a multitude of questions that cross our minds, there are some areas-- our dogs, our children, other people's fetuses-- that seem to invite hyperactive concern and a leaping to conclusions: 

If you are contemplating sharing a bowl of grapes or raisins with your dog, maybe don't.  But if your dog has had a grape and you'd like to know what to do, I'll make a case as a reformed inveterate grape pusher for taking your dog for a walk.

Tuesday, June 21, 2022

Mid-Summer Involuntary Dance Episode

DeeeLite - Good Beat

The Boyoyo Boys - Puleng

Otava Yo (Отава Ё) - Про Ивана Groove (русское готическое R'N'B) - (Groove for Ivan - Russian Gothic R&B)


Jarina de Marco - Give it to me Baby (Rick James cover extraordinaire)


Pyramidos (ピラミッドス) - τα καγκελια (The Railings)

L.A. Witch - I Wanna Lose


The Friends of Distinction - Grazing in the Grass (Hugh Masekela cover)
 

Iggy Pop - Five Foot One


Confidence Man - Holiday (Bruise Remix)



Red Nichols and His Five Pennies - The Peanut Vendor (animation by Len Lye from  1933)


M.D. Shirinda & Gaza Sisters - Pfuka N'wavulolo


TENDER - Belong

Bootsy Collins feat. Fantaazma with cameos by Victor Wooten and Patti Collins- Hip-Hop Lollipop


Rosalía - La Combi Versace


Stopsonic - Now and Here


The Dandy Warhols - Not if You Were the Last Junkie on Earth


BIN-JIP - Dinner with a Demon (Live at Planetarium with Glowing Bulbs)


Pere Ubu - Street Waves


Steve Reich - Violin Phase (choreographed and danced by Anne Teresa de Keersmaeker; Shem Guibbory, violin)





Saturday, June 11, 2022

The soft elitism of low expectations


Have you been watching the January 6 hearings?  I haven't, at least not giving it my full attention.  It has been clear to me for some time that Trump actively encouraged the storming of the capital by a frenzy of angry and entitled (if misinformed) supporters prepared for mayhem that weird day in early 2021, and that he did not particularly care what violence might come out of it-- even suggesting that the lynching of his vice president might not be a bad thing.  But while I assumed that this was due to a misunderstanding on his part about how elections (or civil society) work, I have learned that by not tuning into the hearings fully (they were on in the background at different points of the evening but when it comes to the emissions of our media and our elite these days I was by force of habit tuning them out), I missed a pretty solid case being made for Trump's team acting, on Trump's orders, as though they believed he had really won the election while knowing based on the incontrovertible facts at their disposal that he had in fact lost.  I had to check my complete cynicism in order to grasp that this is pretty significant stuff.  It means that Trump on January 6 was apparently engaging in a coup, attempting to use the power of his office to subvert the will of the people through violence since the results of November were not muddled enough to permit him to go the Bush 2000 route of using his stacked Supreme Court to reverse his loss. 

What has become clearer to me as I have caught the snippets of January 6-ers explicitly acknowledging that they were taking orders from Trump (who in his speech before the attack I was reminded promised to be shoulder to shoulder with the stormers as they breeched the capitol whereas in actuality he merely skittered back to the white house to watch the proceedings on tv from the comfy remove of his la-z-boy), is what fascism looks like.  Brothers and sisters, it looks like you and me. 

Whether he realizes it or not, Trump's novel approach to winning an election is akin to Joe Biden's assertion on Charlemagne tha God's radio show two summers ago, in the course of a campaign in which his only promise was that if he were elected nothing would fundamentally change for his donors, that if you weren't for Joe Biden, "you ain't black."       

Does it ever occur to any of these people that in order to win elections, rather than taking it out of the people-- taking them for granted when they’re not taking advantage of them, lying to them when they’re not  abusing them, antagonizing them when they’re not disrespecting their intelligence, browbeating them when they're not manipulating their numbers-- maybe for a change they should try delivering for them instead? 

When no one is on the people's side, where do the people go?  In an age of conflict and rancor and confusion, they go to certainty-- even if in Trump's case that way lies Chaos.  Chaos got a bit of a holiday in the last election when voters by a substantial margin chose Boring in hopes that Boring would be a change they could believe in, but back to Chaos they will surely go if Boring stops working for them.  How is it working for you lately?



Friday, June 10, 2022

O beauty!

The elements of the spindle top to bottom:  (A) The body ; (B) the compression spring; (C) the pin 

Suffering will always be with us. Almost nothing good can be counted on to be here tomorrow.  However... 

I have lived at my current address for nearly 30 years, far longer than any other address in my life, approaching as long as all other places combined.  This house is five years older than me.  When it was put together at the birth of a new suburb in the environs of a large important city more than 60 years ago, it was equipped with some amenities that are still in use today.  A doorbell that still makes the heart stop when engaged by some unannounced visitor.  A Roper gas range still vented by the original NuTone hood and exhaust fan.  And perhaps most importantly of all, a recessed toilet paper holder with its original wooden spindle which still has its original spring. 

I cannot stress enough the importance of this feature. Just three parts to the spindle: the fixed body  (A) with its end pegged to fit into a niche on either side of the wall recess, and a chamber into which a coiled compression spring (B) is loaded, followed by a pin (C) with a head at one end designed to fit only one way into the chamber and then turned to prevent its retraction and at the other end a counterpart pegged end to fit into the opposite niche from the one that the body's pegged end will occupy.  

To change a roll, the spindle is compressed to clear one of its ends from its niche, the spindle is removed from the recess, the empty roll is replaced on the spindle with a new roll, one end of the spindle is fitted into its niche within the recess and then the spindle is compressed to fit the opposite pegged end into its counterpart niche .  The component which makes this miracle happen every few days is the spring--  0.04 inch gauge steel wire coiled 10 times to a length (a "free length" to use spring terminology as distinct from the length of wire used to make the spring) 1.5 inches around a quarter inch diameter--  the tension of which holds both ends of the spindle in place when a new roll is deployed yet which must be limber enough to permit the compression of the spindle twice every time a roll is replaced.    Who knows how many times a year for 60 years?  

Well the popular statistics site statista knows.  Per a 2018 consumer market study, being an American toilet paper dispenser  (top of the list natch), it is changed on average 141 times per year per person  divided by 2 bathrooms in my house which comes to something like 200 times a year.  At a rate of 1.8 days per roll per year I am certain that this is high, but I’ll go with it on the theory that my under average sized household is statistically on the low side compared to those who preceded me at the address.  Conservatively then, in its more than 65 years of use, the spring has been compressed and extended a minimum of 26,000 times.  

A spring can be expected to last somewhere between 10,000 and 15,000 cycles, so it is already at the high end of life, but based on my intimate experience of it every other day or so, it is not showing its age.  Rather amazing considering that it has spent most of its life compressed-- under stress between the end of the chamber it sits in and the head of the pin it shares its space with.  I frequently marvel at the quality of spring it still has left in it.  And it is older than me, and more used.  I cannot adequately express my appreciation for the quiet certitude I am free to have in the part it plays-- mostly unobserved-- in my daily life.  

Every now and then though (this morning for instance), in changing a roll, some misalignment of the notched head of the pin allows it to clear the shelf of the chamber that holds it in place, at which point the tension of the spring will project the pin and itself out of the chamber onto the dubious, generally poorly lit plane of the bathroom floor.  Whereas the pin is easily spotted, the delicate insubstantial spring, being immediately swallowed up by the darkness of this quadrant of the bathroom floor, risks being inadvertently crushed out of utility by an errant shod foot before it can be found.  Catastrophe in the making!  

On the other hand: