Thursday, April 30, 2026

O fole roncou

And now for something completely different, a 1973 classic from the king of Forró music of Brazil's  Northeast, Luis Gonzaga.  The song was revived in the US by its inclusion up front on Luaka Bop's 1991 release Brazil Classics 3 with liner notes by label founder David Byrne.  The song's title (and first line) refers to the roar of an accordion's bellows.


O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
O Zé Buraco, Pé-de-Foice, Chico Manco
Cabra Macho, Bode Branco
Todo mundo foi brincar
Maria Doida, Margarida Florisbela
Muito triste na janela, não dançou
Não quis entrar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
Naquela noite me grudei com Juventina
E o suspiro da menina era de arrepiar
Baião bonito tão gostoso e alcoviteiro
Que apagou o candeeiro pro forró se animar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
Naquela noite eu fugi com Juventina
Quem mandou a concertina
Meu juízo revirar
Eu sei que morro de bala de carabina
Mas o amor da Juventina
Me dá forças pra brigar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar
O fole roncou no alto da serra
Cabroeira da minha terra
Subiu a ladeira e foi brincar

English (lightly edited from Google Translate's rendition) -

The bellows roared high in the mountains, The kids from my land climbed the hill and went to play.
The bellows roared high in the mountains, The kids from my land climbed the hill and went to play.
Zé hole, Sickle-Foot, Chico Manco
Male Goat, White Goat
Everyone was playing
Crazy Mary, Margaret with the Beautiful Flowers
Very sad in the window, didn't dance,
I did not enter.  
The bellows roared high in the mountains, The kids from my land climbed the hill and went to play.
The bellows roared high in the mountains, The kids from my land climbed the hill and went to play.
That night I clung to Juventina, and the girl's sigh was breathtaking. A beautiful, delicious, and suggestive baião, that blew out the lamp so the forró could liven up.
The bellows roared high in the mountains, The kids from my land climbed the hill and went to play. The bellows roared high in the mountains
The kids from my land
Climbed the hill and went to play
That night I ran away with Juventina
Who ordered the concertina to
Turn my mind around
I know I'll die from rifle bullets
But Juventina's love
Gives me strength to fight
The bellows roared high in the mountains
The kids from my land
Climbed the hill and went to play
The bellows roared high in the mountains
The kids from my land
Climbed the hill and went to play

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

A Manifesto Improved

I made some revisions:

1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation.  It must return all of its gains to a public commons and put an end to itself.

2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps Tech Bros. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible.

3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of the elites of Western culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class will be forgiven only if that is unforgiveableThe culture that replaces the criminal elite of technofeudalism as soon as we are able to put an end to it shall succeed only if it is capable of delivering economic growth and security  for what the public and the planet needs.

4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software.  It requires us to get along with each other and with everyone and everything we share the planet with such that we all prevail TOGETHER.

5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed.  We must criminalize AI weaponry technology worldwide and confiscate its funding and its profits to be redirected toward fulfilling human needs and toward planetary restoration to undo the harms that made it possible.

6. National Planetary and community service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving move away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the costThere is no need for war if we are all engaged in the human and planetary struggle.

7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm's way.  No war.

8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive.  We must replace electoral politics with representatives and leaders scientifically randomly selected from among all of us to represent each of us for short, non-consecutive terms.  Truly government of, for and by the people is the only way out of the mess bought and sold electoral politics has made and enabled.

9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret.  See Number 8.

10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed.  See Number 8

11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice.  We need to learn to disagree intelligently.  We are not enemies.  We are just sisters and brothers who can, must and will get along.

12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin.   We need to expand our sense of possibilities and find room within them for peace, for the meeting of human needs and for the enabling of truly meaningful and inclusive human and planetary flourishing in all of their varieties at every step.

13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet.  The Global North and West, through cultures of unique rudeness and gall, disproportionately benefit from the world's resources due to remorseless exploitation of the Global South.  Our elite academies have been built in the Global North and West to produce a body of learning that excuses this.  We must redress these imbalances once and for all.  There is enough wisdom and intelligence in this world (including even, believe it or not, in suppressed , neglected and ignored patches of the Global North and West) to figure out how to accomplish this rebalancing without further harm to the planet or punishing those undeserving of punishment and with enough urgency, strength and righteousness of purpose to force recalcitrant resisters of the formerly dominant classes to come cooperatively along.

14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war.  See Number 13.

15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia.  See Number 13.

16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk's interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn.  The concept of the market and the grand tales that are told around it are fables that serve the purpose of the marketeers.  We need to re-orient the production of goods to the meeting of needs.  A place of not necessarily remunerated honor can be maintained for those individuals or groups who direct (with our consent and via public ownership of the means) the production of goods thanks to the best ideas and inspiration.

17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives.  There will be less "crime" in a world where needs are met.  We must replace the criminal justice method of responding to injustices with a system of restorative justice.

18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within.  

19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. Billionaires fucking suck. Since 1990,  the world's wealthiest 10% have caused twice as much global warming as the bottom 90% and the smaller the top percentile the worse the violation.  A society that does not ban wealth hoarding is not serious about surviving.

20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite's intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. See Number 8.

21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful.  See Number 13.

22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what?   The future we need but that our bad habits have kept us from is possible, and making it happen has never been more crucial. We are plural.  We are singular.  We walk into the future together or alone.  Together is better. 

Sunday, April 19, 2026

Who is We?

Images of identical strangers curated by François Brunelle in a collection called I'm not a Look-Alike.

Language currency dictates that the shorthand for Americans to refer to the ownership of the geopolitical and military activities of the United States government is "We."  As alienated as Americans are from the activities of the government in general, and this administration in particular, it's a reflex to complain about "we", "us', "our president", "our war", "our hegemony".  I don't know about you but I had nothing to do with it and if I felt any true responsibility for it, I would disown it.  But in spite of the benefit to the warring classes of the reflexive use of "we" by Americans who are excluded from any say in the way the US government and its military conduct themselves in this world-- regardless of whom their votes elect-- the benefit is a built in unmerited self-implication in the guilt: we were never consulted and our opinions would never be heeded.  This is the nature of the government we find ourselves subject to.  According to polls, we do not approve of it, and yet that fact and, thanks to Trump's inflation, an arm-and-a-leg will get you a cup of coffee.

What kind of world do we want to build?  

More to the point: Who is 'We'?

This is a question that anyone who is interested in the future of the planet must take seriously.  For many, we is of course the community, the nation, the hemisphere, the species, the planet.  In reality, American society in particular indulges the worst predilections—the predilections that privilege the worst most diseased people.  When there is blame to go around, "We" is to blame.  We allow the greedy to get rich.  We allow the rich to lie to us and have their way with the only planet we've ever known. We allow the powerful to police us (and even worse to police themselves).  We allow police to deprive us of our freedom.  These are indulgences that we give without thought.

We sound culpable, and yet any less than superficial analysis will reveal that the "We" who passively let the worst have their way with the world are absent from the pronoun.  There is no us there doing the letting.  The worst do not ask our permission.   They do not burden us with a choice of how we are to survive.  They simply employ us as they wish in return for the meager means to prolong our survival into tomorrow's labor pool.  

There was once a prevailing sense of community that mitigated the order we found ourselves in on gaining consciousness of the world.  Community educated us and involved us.  It got many of us organized in the workplace, and to some extent at the polls.  That decayed particularly rapidly in the 1980's with the rise of Reaganism and Thatcherism, the twin brands of Neoliberalism.  It was Margaret Thatcher who tolled the death knell by declaring, "There is no such thing as society."  Her words marked the open race to enclose every last commons for corporate profit.  There was no turning back.  Government was rapidly re-oriented from community and commonality to the principle that individuals were responsible for their own predicaments and that no function of government was too sacred to be privatized.  Billionaires were simply individuals who wanted the success available to all badly enough to work for it.  The poor by behaving imprudently were choosing poverty for themselves.  Employers were not obligated to care for their workers-- they were paying their workers to be ambitious enough to care for them.  Employment was not for life, but "at will".  Your co-workers were not comrades but competition.  You were expendable.  Contrary to the fiction that each individual was responsible for the circumstances we all found ourselves in, the hard reality for those beholden to employers for their sustenance was that every individual was an island in a hostile sea, an atom cast adrift in a void.  No such thing as society meant no such thing as "We".  Collective impact on the world being impossible in this collective-less world, activism now extended only as far as individual performance characterized by bumper sticker self-expression and "ethical" shopping. 

It took a financial disaster caused by the reckless abandon of the elite to cause stirrings of consciousness of how far we had fallen from our ability to come together to reclaim our shared destiny.  "Change we can believe in." turned out to be a lie, but "We are the 99%" became a rallying cry that woke some of us from our slumber.  It inspired the Presidential campaigns of Bernie Sanders who re-introduced us to the concept of "Not me. Us."   The stifling of the pandemic of Social Democracy in 2020 was throat clearing for the elite handling of the COVID pandemic.  When Social Democracy threatened to bring us together in solidarity, COVID atomized us again.  We have not recovered.  Social media consolidates the commons-suffocating impulses of the right and it fragments the many warring strands of the left.  The right gains ground in spite of its inherent unpopularity. Meanwhile, the left can only bicker over the tattering of what's left of the planet and of Us.

What is to become of us?  May we relearn how to find out together.

~~~~~

An antidote to the dissolution is Naomi Klein's Döppelganger and particularly its ultimate chapter: Unselfing.  

Saturday, April 11, 2026

Down with the Home Team

In a Twitter post (or X or whatever), Shaun Maguire, a 41 year old venture capitalist with Sequoia Capital and advisor to Trump wondered aloud:  "How did we get to the point Where (sic) so many Americans are rooting against America?"  Ryan Grim offered this response:

If this is an honest question, I'd say: Americans are rooting against America because we facilitated a genocide and followed it with a surprise attack on a girls elementary school followed by attacks on universities, medical centers, more schools, a world famous pharmaceutical research center,  a volleyball team, an unfinished bridge we claimed was transporting weapons and then a nuclear power plant.  We are now promising endless attacks on civilian infrastructure.

We are hunting and targeting anyone who might be involved in ceasefire negotiations.

Most people do not pay enough attention to have absorbed all the propaganda about the U.S. and Iran. So people coming to this fresh see us for what we are: absolute monsters.  And monsters must be stopped.  That's why people are rooting against us and for civilization to prevail.

 To which I would add, who are the traitors here?   The American people, or the "President" who was apparently blackmailed by Israel into conducting an illegal war against a county that not only was not attacking us but that after at least 2 other unprovoked attacks by this President including most recently the murder of a general by bomb last summer, was prepared (and expecting) to enter into talks with the US and Israel that very day but was besieged by deadly weapons instead.  Without consulting Congress or making even a gesture of an attempt to persuade or seek buy-in from the American people (which given the shaky foundations of this bellicose Administration's motives would have been fruitless anyway).  Is it the people who were not asked or informed (to this day) about the intentions, let alone the reasons for engaging in this war, or is it the "President" whose reckless conduct of this purposeless assault on a non-threatening country has already deeply damaged the American economy and threatens very much to engender a global depression that is likely to dwarf the one a century ago.  Who is the traitor?  The answer was recently unilaterally glued onto the front end of the Kennedy Center.