Monday, June 19, 2023

Mid-Summer Feral Dance Rapture

Salah Ragab & The Cairo Jazz Band - Egypt Strut 


Vud (feat. TVÅ) - Underwater


Paupière - Défunte lune de miel


Kishore Kumar - Aise Na Mujhe Tum Dekho - from Darling Darling (1977)


The Go-Betweens - Was There Anything I Could Do?


Didem - Dum Dum Tak


Sparks - Perfume


J-Cut & Kolt Siewerts - The Flute Tune (Soulpride Remix)


Wayne Shorter - Tom Thumb


Chemical Brothers w/ Beth Orton - Where Do I Begin?


Sylvan Esso - Coffee


Sevana - Lowe Mi


Rita Lee - Panis et Circenses


The Royal Wind Music - Pierre Phalèse / Bransle Gay from Liber primus leviorum carminum


Viagra Boys - To the Country


Crystal & Runnin' Wild - What a Way to Die


Besh o Drom - Tortapápir




Trio Mandili - Rachuli (Live in Leipzig)








Sunday, June 11, 2023

Ooh baby baby


We think we are a youth culture.  In truth we hate the young.   We now force them into existence.  Then we starve them.  We starve their schools. A good number of us are trying to censor their learning-- circumscribing what they can know or think.  We steal from their future by killing their planet.  When they reach voting age we shut them out of our politics by offering them no choices and lingering for far too long at the reins.  And then we blame them for the chaos that surrounds us.  

And yet for ourselves, as we exercise, dye, style, and surgery ourselves to keep old age at bay, youthfulness is everything.

Youthfulness is one thing, eternal babyhood is quite another.  For all of our fetishization of wealth and progress and growth-- ours is a culture stuck in babyhood.   If you have the television on for 5 minutes you will be assaulted by baby talk, baby music, baby thoughts talking down to you from every corner of the screen.  And that's just the ads.  Cartoon mascots, doody jokes,  bright baby colors, shiny objects, ludicrously fantastic baby messages trying to engage the infant part of your brain (and probably usually succeeding).   Our news is content free happy talk. Our entertainment is hardly better-- super heroes, that same sickly sweet computer animation that has taken over our culture since the 1990s, loud brain-dead game shows and contests, shows fetishizing fame or sitcoms about stupid horrible families in the suburbs, or dramas about big boy jobs like policeman and fireman and doctor. 

Television monopolizes our attention, but it’s only one way we maintain a baby’s eye view of things. Our culture is adamantly intent on remaining frozen in a mindset of object impermanence, ignoring what it doesn’t see.  TV is passive but much of our willfully limited attention is actively engaged in activities like bookburning, legislating against behaviors we don’t want to tolerate, censoring ideas as if covering our eyes makes what we hate and fear disappear. It's reflected even in our technology. We think AI will be super human, but I’m afraid super human means super baby. Why does Auto-correct have no idea what you meant when you wrote "motherficker"  by mistake?  Because the people who designed it would rather not deal with the babies among their users who don't want anyone to acknowledge that bad words and bad thoughts exist. 

The coming Presidential election as permitted to be seen on TV promises to be wall-to-wall baby talk, by and about a pathetic lineup of candidates from an atomically small number of parties and platforms trying to annoy us with wokeness and anti-wokeness long enough to keep funded until 2024.  That either of the only 2 parties that are permitted to figure in our politics represents "the grownups in the room" is laughable on its face.  But the "daddy"republican party is uncontestably the worst.  

Babies don't understand and may need explaining to that when and if they grow up, in spite of every effort that our baby education system will make to keep the information from them, they will develop feelings in their uh-oh places that are no one else's business.  Ron DeSantis or as I like to call him, Puddintane, doesn't want you to understand CRT because then you might understand him.  It's the same reason the recently deceased racist, cretin and simpering homophobe Pat Robertson lingered to the age of 93 without learning a thing.  And like a baby sitting in his spoiled diaper for 93 years, Robertson did not want anyone else to learn anything either.  This is what conservatism and fundamental religion are- willful selective stunting of the mind, of possibilities for life on earth, of tolerance for the growth and happiness of people who are not you sitting in your used nappy for 93 years.

It is a pity that there is no hell because that is where Robertson would surely be, but the consolation for the ironic deliciousness of Robertson writhing in eternal damnation not being a thing is that in reality he has just ceased, and is thankfully finally yielding his material back to the universe where something else can now surely make better use of it.

Self-stunting is not restricted to the right.  Far, far too many on the ostensible left think revolution is achieved by tattling and loud whining.  All the spoiled babies of the left are whining to be heard over each other in the tiny corner of the playpen that mother twitter has reserved for them, outbitching each other as if that is the method for getting a diaper change.  You can start to think the diaper is the only change we need to believe in if it would only ever come.

To ease the pain of our rash, we can go on pretending a revolution is coming to save us if only we could shut up the other loud left whiny babies surrounding us.  On the right, we could believe that if only by our performative tantrums we could prevent others from learning and reading about possibilities beyond the ones that favor us and our position of exaltedness in the high chair at the head of the baby table we could stay there forever.   We can keep pretending there is a caring loving god who rewards us for doing his will and cruelly punishing those who don't.  We can pretend Burger King gives a fuck about us having it our way.  We can pretend Pfizer's goal is our health.  We can pretend ExxonMobil is "fueling the world safely and responsibly."  We can pretend Santa Clause exists.  

Or we can grow up, quit treating each other and ourselves like infants, respect our differences, give the reality we have made for ourselves a long hard sobering mature look  and finally learn to take care of our planet,  ourselves and each other together.  Like grownups.   

Thursday, June 1, 2023

Flat tones

 I’m reading a book about people who believe in a flat earth* so I’m frankly quite frightened of the USA.  While I was deep into reading about people who think the rest of the world is crazy for thinking they’re crazy this morning on metro, 2 very unconventional looking people got on the train—a tall skinny circle bearded man in a trucker hat with an American flag on a pole sticking out of his backpack and a female I assume is his significant other, a tall and gaunt sour faced heavily made up dyed blonde also with a backpack who took the seat behind him, both of them facing me.  I imagine the flag poking out of the backpack is what made the dude take so long to sit down.  I had to not stare at them for 2 stations and when I got off, the dude gave me the eye.  I’ll just say they fit the profile that is forming in my mind.  I was reading at the time about a guy who engaged in flat-smacking I think he calls it which is aggressively confronting globe earthers about their beliefs.  Globe earthers are everywhere of course, so all he has to do when he’s walking down the street and feeling pugnacious is film himself defying anyone who catches his eye to challenge his beliefs. He has a video channel for YouTube documenting the lunatic intransigence of globe earthers.  

It's important to note that those 2 weirdos were each wearing military green jackets and seemed to have the same material backpacks, but were decidedly not active enlistees if you catch my drift.  And the dude whose backpack was quite tall and as I say unwieldy onaccounta it had a big old broomstick with an American flag affixed sticking out of it, really slouched expansively in his seat with his giant backpack next to him which is probably why his old lady knew not to sit next to him but upright and alert in the seat behind him.  Real charmers in my fervid imagination.  But I’m not judgmental. 

A sudden spray of Glock fire did cross my mind as a possibility.  It wasn’t an obsession.  I was more in a hating frame of mind myself honestly.  Almost grateful to be handed a dickwad to loathe.  Just as a palliative or something. Because truthfully I am interested in the topic of what makes people be like people.  Why is everyone so typical?  I hear a bit of myself when I imagine flat earthers’ laying into those who in their company innocently betray a passive working theory that the world is round and not the center of the universe.  I hear in them myself reacting to someone innocently parroting some ass on CNN about Ukraine.  (usually keeping it to myself unless it’s my wife. Sorry, honey.)  So let me be clear: I hate in flat earthers and conspiracy dolts to a great extent what I hate in myself.  I feel like my convertibility flag was activated and hyperextended by religion and religious people when I was too young to know better and it makes me an obnoxious convert about everything that makes sense to me as an injustice.  It’s why I fear becoming a Flat Earther or a q-nut.  I engage with the facts the same way.  Like someone itching to proselytize (if only I could find a belief to proselytize about.)  I’m overstating a tad, but let’s be real, not completely.

A thesis of the book* is that facebook and youtube’s algorithms bear a good bit of responsibility for the global blossoming of flat earth theory (especially amongst certain types of Americans) after almost 2 centuries of nearly universal indifference to flat earth theory punctuated by periodic and isolated flowerings, because both platforms exploited the curiosity factor to push freaky fringe ideas on anyone who betrayed any interest in adjacent eccentric belief systems.  Flat Earth theory having a uniquely WTF allure to it fit the bill of both companies’ interest in addicting users of their sites to longer and longer dippings into the rabbit hole.  There probably wasn’t an appreciation at either facebook or youtube that in the face of near unanimous planetary consensus among scientists and laypeople alike that the planet is as round as all the evidence plainly shows, the hurdle of believing such a patently absurd notion as that the earth is as flat as the writers of the bible thought it was all evidence to the contrary is a guarantee that the belief will be unshakeable even in the face of ostracism and ridicule.  It’s tailor made for cult level thinking like so many other ideas that have been churned up from the depths of the web.  There’s a quality that these absurd theories have in common—they make fanatic true believers who are highly motivated to keep the addictive  corrosive irresistible material coming.  That’s really all that matters.  I mean what are they going to do, censor the stuff?  That’s even worse than giving it free reign in the marketplace of ideas.  

Catherine Liu's American Idyll is in many ways about this too.  People hate the experts.  They hate the know-it-alls.  So they full throttle embrace anything that flips the motherfuckers off.   They worship the anti-experts largely as a fuck you to the experts. And let's be honest, our experts are a very sorry lot who have fuck yous coming to them.   And ironically the people who hate experts, in flocking to anti-experts replicate a negative image of the institutions they hate, of the canon.  But it's a canon for them, and not for the know-it-alls.†

~~~~

*Off the Edge by Kelly Weill

† Having just read Elizabeth Winkler's Shakespeare Was a Woman and Other Heresies (which I also highly recommend) I'm reminded by contrast, after all, of the inability of the priests of the canon to distinguish between crackpot theory and legitimate scholarly questioning of orthodox received opinion.  Pursuing the Shakespeare Authorship controversy online, I came across a conversation between Carol Rutter and Stanley Wells in which the latter, perhaps the supreme Stratfordian (i.e., person who believes the author of the works of Shakespeare was ... get ready for this... Shakespeare!actually says it's "immoral to question history" as we receive it.  If facts alone weren't enough to raise doubt about the official story (and they are), stuff like this is fodder for contrarianism.

Sunday, May 28, 2023

Losing Our Job

The Roches singing Terre Roche's Losing Our Job with Terre on lead and Maggie on keyboard* at McCarter Theatre, Princeton, NJ April 14, 1990.

(Video credit Jonathan Bernstein)

~~~~~

* Not to mention Suzzy on harmony.

Saturday, May 20, 2023

Primary Concern

 

 You could play "One of these things is not like the others" with the above until your head explodes.

When I hear Joe Biden's voice my skin wants to crawl up into a tiny ball detach itself and roll under the couch with a blender blasting near its earholes until it's over.  But I sympathize with Bernie Sanders' position of support for Biden's re-election in light of the refusal of the toxic cloud of smog that is Biden's interminable public service to dissipate before the 2024 election.  I don't share the support at this juncture but I sympathize both because I can relate to having a preference for Biden's brand of disappointment assuming he is the Democratic nominee than nearly any likely alternative with a realistic chance to win in November (given the well established workings of the American political machinery); and because I am grateful to Bernie Sanders for everything he has done to relieve my sense of doom however temporarily and is doing to mitigate the relentlessness of proceedings in Washington, and consequently-- call me a softie-- he gets a lifetime pass from me on everything.

Bernie is not running.  This represents a passage and it is cause for grieving.  But life is a process of loss and gain.  It is a season for renewal.  In the absence of choice, it is time to choose a preference for 2024.*  Unfortunately for the country, but fortunately for my attention span, it's a short menu.

RFK, Jr - I can think of no reason to want RFK to be the Democratic nominee other than that he's not Joe Biden.  This is not reason enough.  What's more, he has a demonstrated unyielding adherence to the wrong side of a scientific question (the efficacy of vaccines) on political principle (an understandable skepticism of the profit motive of the pharmaceutical companies that manufacture them) that is really troubling.  Wrong for the right reason is still wrong, no matter how steadfast you are in your righteousness.  (And his voice...?  I mean, C'mon man!)

Marianne Williamson.  You could do so much worse.  Like Bernie, she represents an opportunity and an occasion for people to come together in the project of building a better future for all.  In December, when Joe Biden was threatening striking rail workers over their right to have co-workers on their mega-trains and to be granted even one sick day let alone a week's worth, Marianne Williamson wrote:

The idea that the Democrats are the party of the working class has been taking a hit for decades; with Biden’s latest hypocritical move supporting management in the railroad dispute, it’s pretty much smashed to bits. In this situation at least, the president who has called himself “pro-labor” would be called by FDR an “economic royalist.”

She comes by her labor support and her FDR scholarship honestly-- she has said she intends a Williamson presidency to cut through 50 plus years of retreat from government that works for people to revive FDR's never fully realized Economic Bill of Rights.   In her video announcing her candidacy, she said that in order to combat the seductive lies that will be thrown at voters from the candidates of the right, "we need to submit to the American People an agenda of fundamental economic reform: Universal healthcare; tuition free college at state colleges and universities;  higher education including tech schools; paternity and maternity leave; free child care; and a guaranteed living wage."  She's right.  She is a passionate advocate for Reparations for American Descendants of Slavery and if you listen to her on the subject, you are liable to become one yourself.  She is an exponent of what she calls a "Politics of Love."  Having not yet read her book of the name, I don't know what exactly that is, but I like the sound of it and am looking forward to having my imagination expanded in discovering for myself what she means by it.  She is often mocked for her spiritual approach to politics -- those who ridicule her would like you to think it's because she's full of shit.  The more I look at her though it's the absolute absence of shit in her discourse that appeals to me most about her.  Experiencing her as an outsider and something of a political beginner,  I find her outlook, her mission and her style to be refreshingly honest, heartfelt and wholly original.  She's the only candidate who acknowledges the epidemic of trauma and anxiety due to economic precarity among ordinary people and its impact on crime, mental health, and well being; and the only one who promises to make addressing it a priority of her presidency.

I don't at this stage† have any delusion that she will win the democratic nomination from Joe Biden who has indicated he will play it safe and not debate any democratic challengers.   Moreover she will have a media stacked up against her.  However, in challenging Joe Biden (or whoever among the anointed is around next year) to carry the flag of the democratic nomination to deliver for the people, I think it's not unreasonable to expect that her campaign could build enough momentum to achieve a measure of success.  

If Joe Biden will be the Democratic nominee anyway, why waste a primary vote on him if you can freely vote your own preferences? Regardless of how anxious you are about November, spring is the time to plant seeds for a better future.  If the seed planters lose but in a big way, the canned candidate will get the message.  (And if the seed planters win...  fill in your own blanks)

In the absence of Bernie, I endorse Marianne.  What I felt for Bernie was passion.  What I feel for Marianne is gratitude for just being there.

~~~~~

* Other than a different political system.  If Bernie were in the running I would be completely in, but it’s not like I think people should care about the presidency rather than say about where to start in on tearing this shit down, but as long as we're stuck with the current system,  there’s something appealing about the simplicity of a presidential campaign. People get it. It gets attention.  It raises passions.  Even people who swear it’s unimportant and counterproductive can’t tune it out.  That’s powerful stuff. 

† At this stage I wouldn’t think of my involvement in any campaign as anything other than therapy for myself.  Perhaps it’s from reading Bernie's new book, It's OK to be Angry About Capitalism, but I recognize that there is a huge gulf between me in late fall 2019 and me in mid spring 2023. I think I’m actually close to what 2019 me might have observed as despair.  2019 me might have thought that having the level of despair I have in 2023 would not be possible because there are several notches below this level that I would surely be unable to survive.  But 2023 me can see because it’s in front of my face that a person can live with a shit ton more despair than a hopeful person might imagine.  Why they do is a mystery but on a tiny bit of examination it might be because it’s hard to rise out of laziness when there is only despair where motivation might be. 

This might sound rather bleak, and on some level it is, but I think what surprises me is that bleak doesn’t have to mean instant death—it can also be a survivable wallpaper to one’s existence.  (Don’t freak out—the news to take from this is I’m not going anywhere and also that I have a bit of a dearth of hope.)  Anyway!1  My point is, I possibly have enough hope to scrape together to see if pretending to be involved in the next presidential election might provide some temporary relief from the despair.  The trick would be doing all this with full knowledge that nothing I do will prevent things from continuing to get worse in the meantime.  ^_^

Saturday, May 13, 2023

Happy Mother's Day!

The states of Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia*  would like to wish you all -- all of you with fertile wombs (regardless of age, of how you self-identify, or how you got pregnant)-- Happy Mother's Day!   

North Dakota and Wisconsin** have made it convenient for you to enjoy your first Mother's Day by chasing abortion providers to other states.  

Iowa and Montana*** and Indiana, Wyoming and Ohio**** hopefully wish you Happy Mother's Day while awaiting court decisions or the right legislation.  

Utah, Arizona, Florida and Georgia**** extend Mother's Day greetings to those whose zygotes are past their gestational cutoffs, whether they know they are pregnant or not.

And counting!

Mandatory Mother's Day to fertile wombs on behalf of the State!

~~~~

* Near total abortion bans

**  Abortion unavailable: "North Dakota (last clinic moved to Minnesota); Wisconsin (clinics are not performing abortions while enforcement status of the state's pre-Roe v Wade law is decided.)"

*** Bans currently blocked by courts

**** Bans are in the works - "Iowa's Supreme Court has ruled the state constitution no longer protects a woman's right to abortion; Montana - state courts committed to protection of abortion rights while legislature and governor plan bans; Nebraska has not yet succeeded at passing a ban."

**** Gestational Bans (Utah - 18 weeks; Arizona -15 weeks, Florida, Georgia - 6 weeks.)

Thursday, May 4, 2023

If I were king

King eight I

If I  were absolute monarch of the US:

I would declare education, child care, healthcare, welfare, mass transportation and journalism (for starters) free and universal.  I would forgive all debt and use the national treasury -- which would be fixed instantly by selective retroactive restoration of fairness in the tax system to Eisenhower era levels-- to fill in shortfalls for all of my subjects. Free quality housing would be constructed for all who need it.  Free fast unfettered internet access would be available for everyone. I would bring back public access radio and television.  Free hamsters would be available upon request. 

I would nationalize most essential industries and unfairly destroy any existing competition with rock bottom prices.  The management of the industries would make the same salaries as the workers.  Workers would be part of management.  Labor saving measures would result in shorter workdays and workweeks for workers with no reduction in pay.  Syndicates, guilds and unions would have a comeback.  Jobs would be guaranteed for all who want them when they want them.  Corporate Boards? Stockholders? The C-suite?... meh.

Environmental restoration would be a priority -- a sector would be decreed into existence to address it.  There is an added benefit: with corporate profit a dying priority and a decreasing motivation for paltry exploitive "job creation", displaced workers from the corporate sector would find a thriving job market-- of jobs that actually matter-- in the new public environmental sector.  Real estate and wealth formerly enclosed by a capitalist class would be reincorporated into the commons.

Science, industry, economics and AI would be oriented to serving everybody not just a self-selected "meritocracy".  

I would declare a new standard unit of measurement: the squench.  This would be the distance from Jeff Bezos's lips to my ass.

If I were king, corporate malfeasance and lying, pillaging and murder in the name of military adventurism would no longer be the only crimes that go unpunished.  I would de-criminalize everything, abolish police, prisons, criminal courts and lawyers.  Intellectual property would no longer be a thing. And incidentally, I would put an end to lying, pillaging and murder in the name of state military adventurism.

I would reserve a wait and see attitude on public executions of the malfeasant.

For my own amusement, I would decree that the balance of the bank accounts of every citizen (including those who now have a bank account only because of the free public banking that I would decree into existence) would be filled to match the wealth of the wealthiest person.  I don't know what would happen but I would very much enjoy the spectacle of money being suddenly abundant for all but valueless.

I would abolish political parties and elections and put in their place a system of sortition to select members of the legislature, executive and judicial branches randomly from among the entire population for short, non-consecutive terms.   Sortition would also be the manner of selecting individuals for certain essential functions of the state such as diplomacy, defense, the assurance of met needs, and the auditing of governmental functions.

I would stay in power to ease the new system into being until it is functioning smoothly.  I would gradually take my fingers out of the pie and at the right time, abdicate my throne abolishing monarchy with my exit.

Then I would retire to my public housing unit where I would live out my days signing autographs for the children and raising my hamsters.